Drake isn’t letting this one go quietly, the Toronto heavyweight is back in court, pushing hard to revive his ‘Not Like Us’ lawsuit against Universal Music Group, and the tone hasn’t softened.
At the centre of it all is Kendrick Lamar’s diss track ‘Not Like Us’, a song that didn’t just dominate charts, but cut deep into reputation territory, Drake’s argument is blunt, the track crossed a line (per Digital Music News).
Drake’s legal team is sticking to the claim that the song’s message went beyond typical rap beef, they argue that its “core pedophilia message” led listeners to believe he “sexually abuses children.”
UMG, on the other hand, is treating it as business as usual, in their view, diss tracks live in exaggeration and opinion, not fact, they’ve pushed back, arguing Drake is trying to “strip words from their context” and turn standard rap warfare into a defamation case.
It’s a clash that cuts right to the core of how hip-hop is understood, both inside the culture and outside of it.
The ‘reasonable listener’ argument
One of the key battlegrounds here is who the music is actually speaking to, Drake’s appeal leans heavily on the idea that not everyone listening is a rap insider, his team argues that while dedicated fans might recognise diss track conventions, the average listener doesn’t.
They claim a “reasonable listener could (and countless did) construe” the song “as factually asserting that Drake sexually abuses children.”
That distinction matters, it shifts the argument from lyrical sparring to perceived real world harm.
Beyond the rap bubble
Drake’s filing also points to moments where the song reached wider audiences, including Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show performance.
They describe it as “a republication far outside the original rap battle,” exposing the track to viewers who may not have followed the back and forth, the suggestion is clear, once the song leaves the culture that understands it, the meaning changes.
No ‘free pass’ for rap
UMG and others have warned that cases like this could threaten artistic expression, Drake’s team isn’t buying it.
“This fearmongering is baseless,” the filing states, adding: “That this case involves rap does not give UMG a free pass for defamation.”
What happens next
The appeal keeps the case alive for now, but it’s far from settled, alongside this, Drake is also dealing with separate legal issues, including claims tied to streaming irregularities.
For now, the bigger question hangs in the air. Where does diss culture end, and legal liability begin?
Follow me for more on the Australian and US Metal Scene:
RELATED
MORE IN News
